T1H5Rice
Friday, March 2, 2012
Thursday, February 23, 2012
Saturday, December 3, 2011
Friday, November 11, 2011
Evaluating Websites
1- While evaluating the first website, Google Gulp, I found that the website was flawed because there was no author, but it is a organiztion, and there is not a way to contact them. The second website, Aluminum Foil Deflector Beanie, I think that the website is very accurate, and very well studied, because it has contact information, and is by an organization.But on the other hand I am not sure because it hasn't been updated since 2008.
3- The first site was 50 megs, that I looked at was very persuading but it didn't have any contact numbers, and it didnt say when it was last updated. It also wasnt very structured well, it didn't say much to persuade someone to go, but enough that they would look more into it. The second site was Makonta, was the best site, because it had contact information, and it had very updated information, like the plaque that was being placed there today at 11 A.M., also it was very nice, it made me want to go there, and it was very organized. The last site was Wikipedia, it was all over teh place, wasn't organized, had no contact information, wasn't very inviting, and interesting.I didnt like that it didnt provide the information I was interested and needed.
3- The first site was 50 megs, that I looked at was very persuading but it didn't have any contact numbers, and it didnt say when it was last updated. It also wasnt very structured well, it didn't say much to persuade someone to go, but enough that they would look more into it. The second site was Makonta, was the best site, because it had contact information, and it had very updated information, like the plaque that was being placed there today at 11 A.M., also it was very nice, it made me want to go there, and it was very organized. The last site was Wikipedia, it was all over teh place, wasn't organized, had no contact information, wasn't very inviting, and interesting.I didnt like that it didnt provide the information I was interested and needed.
Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Citation Builder Critique
I liked about Easybib, because it was that it was very easy to use. It had a search bar for the thing you were looking for and filled as much information as was shown, in the report/page. I also liked it because it made everything easy, it made it easy for me to look up any site, book, newspaper, or magazine, ect. and would make it easy for me to learn about that peice of work. On the other hand I think that CitationMachine was harder because it was more confusing than Easybib, and sourceaid. CitationMachine had more information needed to fill in. It also made it hard to understand considering that was the first time I used CitationMachine. I liked it because when you had finished putting in all the information, you learned a lot more than the other sites showed. Sourceaid was easy and hard. It was easy because it didn't need too much information, but it made it look like there was a lot when it organized it all. It was hard because you had to change the type of article, and then it changes the information needings.
Tuesday, November 8, 2011
Thursday, November 3, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)